“Big Water” in China

April 21, 2007 - Leave a Response

The most interesting article that I read in the May 2007 edition of Vanity Fair was entitled “The Rise of Big Water”  by Charles C. Mann.   This article was about “Big Water”  and how their is some debate over whether water should be controlled by the government or businesses.    “Big Water” is a collective term that is used for water companies that take control of city water systems, especially those in poorer parts of the world.  This article for the most part focused on China. 

Qin Huairen , a Changzhou native, witnessed the transformation of China’s environment.  First there was the destruction of forests during THe Great Leap Foreward, then texile factories sprang up in Changzhou and heavily polluted Yangtze River.  Qin recalled, “First the fish died and then the water turned dark.”  He described the stench as you walked across a bridge over the river as a smell that could “make you choke.”   Qin decided that he wanted to do something about the polluted water.  Every year from 1985 until 1995 Qin had his middle school students draw water from the canal and do simple water quality tests.  It was no surprize that every year the results got worse.  Qin sent then sent his results to the government.   People in Changzhou were too afraid of drinking this water, so they began to dig their own wells .  But, so many wells have been dug that the groundwater has now been overexploited and as a result the local ground level has shrunk two feet.

As a result of that the government outlawed well digging.  Qin wanted to serious changes made about the water quality so he created the Changzhou Environmental Education Resource Society which he ran from his middle school classroom.  Qin wanted to educate people about the very poor water quality and have them demand change.  The government did make a change, but it was not the kind that Qin had expected.  In 2005 the government outsourced the job of managing the water supply to Veolia, a French compapny.  Qin had expected that the government would have mandated that local factories clean up their wastes more. 

 ”Big Water” can have its advantages as well as disadvantages.  Some people believe that Big Water just allows wealthy businessmen to exploit poorer countries by water rate hikes whenever they feel like it.  This unfortunatley is sometimes the case, but not always.  Some people believe that water is a right and people should never have to pay for it.  But either way you view water control something needs to be done and done quickly.  Maude Barlow, the national chair of an advocate group in Canada said, “  Every day more children die from dirty water than from HIV/AIDs, malaria, war, accidents all put together.”  That is very distrurbing.  Water is a basic human right and yet children are dying every day because they do not have access to it.   

          Click to download

A Chinese man shovels garbage from a water canal in Beijing, China, Monday, June 13, 2005. China’s booming economic growth is fueling a rapid rise in water pollution that could leave its fast-growing cities without enough clean drinking water, according to a government report released last week. The report said more than 100 of China’s 660 cities face water shortages. (AP Photo)

China, which is home to about 500 million people, is in serious trouble.  On a scale from one to five, on which a three is minimally acceptable and a five is a direst health hazard, five of China’s seven main river basins are 4s.  About half of China’s municipalities, especially those in urban areas have no waste treatment system, and about one third of China’s population does not have piped water.   China is now undertaking the largest water project ever known to man.  It is three extremely large 700 mile channels that will send 12 trillion gallons of water a year from the South.  To help them with this project China welcomed Big Water.  Veolia, the world’s biggest water-service provider,  manages the water systems in 17 cities in China. 

There are four basic functions of water services:  purify the water in a stream, deliver the purified water to homes and bunsinesses, extend and also repair the piping network.  Although this may not seem like alot, it is a daunting task.  This is a very expensive process for Big Water companies, so they tend to charge high prices for their water services. So the water that people are receiving is now clean, but it can cost sometimes up to one fourth of their montly income.  Au Loong Yu, an environmental activist from Hong Kong said, ” I do not have anything against private enterprises, but in countries with no democratic input-either because the state is too weak, or as it is in China, too strong- these companies have become dictators themselves.” 

As far as my own opinion over whether outsourcing water control is good or bad thing, I am unsure.  On one hand people are gaing access to purified water, but then on the other hand they are sometimes paying large amounts for it.  I intend to continue to research this topic and look at other sources to help form my opinion and i’ll blog about it again when I figure it out. 

Sources:

“The Rise of Big Water”  by Charles C Mann.  Vanity Fair May 2007.

image: http://accuweather.ap.org/cgi-bin/apl.pl

Celebrate Earth Day…the EPA way!!

April 21, 2007 - Leave a Response

Eath day is almost here. April 22, the day when people are reminded each year how important it is to be aware of how their living habits effect the Earth. Earth Day was first celebrated in on April 22, 1970 . There are many other historic dates and informationabout Earth Day that you can learn about by visiting http://www.epa.gov/earthday/history.htm.  This year the EPA encourages people to not only reduce, reuse, and recycle, but also to save energy and use water efficently. The EPA website gives ways to protect the environment through actions at home, at work, at school and other places.

At home the EPA encourages people to: purchase durable or long-lasting goods, use  products and packaging that are as free of toxics as possible, and redesign products so that they use less raw materials in production, have a longer life, orso that they may be used again after its original use.  Also for at home, the EPA gives ways to recycle at home: 

Ways to Reuse

  • Using durable coffee mugs.
  • Using cloth napkins or towels.
  • Refilling bottles.
  • Donating old magazines or surplus equipment.
  • Reusing boxes.
  • Turning empty jars into containers for leftover food.
  • Purchasing refillable pens and pencils.
  • Participating in a paint collection and reuse program

The following are some of the benefits of recycling according to the EPA:

Benefits of Recycling

  • Conserves resources for our children’s future.
  • Prevents emissions of many greenhouse gases and water pollutants.
  • Saves energy.
  • Supplies valuable raw materials to industry.
  • Creates jobs.
  • Stimulates the development of greener technologies.
  • Reduces the need for new landfills and incinerators.

        Click to download

In this photo provided by the Florida Keys News Bureau, sand sculpturists mingle near their creations that spelled “Keep Keys Green” Saturday, April 8, 2006, at the Cheeca Lodge in Islamorada, Fla. Participants teamed up and paid $250 for the right to form each letter with proceeds benefitting a local treatment and rehabilitation center for indigenous wild birds. The event was the first in a series of Earth Day celebrations set to continue in the Keys through April 22, the date that actually marks Earth Day. (AP Photo/Florida Keys News Bureau, Jim Stephens)

Another way to reduce damage to the Earth at home is through composting. Composting is “The controlled biological decomposition of organic matter, such as food and yard wastes, into humus, a soil-like material. Composting is nature’s way of recycling organic waste into new soil, which can be used in vegetable and flower gardens, landscaping, and many other applications.” When people take care of their lawn, saving their grass clippings and using them as a nutrient for the lawn would be an example of composting. Some of the benefits of composting are:

Benefits of Composting

  • Keeps organic wastes out of landfills.
  • Provides nutrients to the soil.
  • Increases beneficial soil organisms (e.g., worms and centipedes).
  • Suppresses certain plant diseases.
  • Reduces the need for fertilizers and pesticides.
  • Protects soils from erosion.
  • Assists pollution remediation.

The EPA is celebrating the Clean School Bus USA initiative on Earth DAy.  This organization is to reduce the amount of pollution released by diesel school buses and reduce kids exposure to diesel exhaust.   The EPA irges people to become involved with this project at their schools, in hope of created serious change.  The EPA also urges people to become aware of the pesticides that are used in their school, learn more and educate others about the environment, and many other things. For a full list visit http://www.epa.gov/earthday/classroom.htm.

 The EPA is sponsoring some other Earth Day events this year too.  For example, it is teaming up with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and other partners, to encourage morning train riders to recycle their newspapers.  The WTMA recycles about 200 tons of newsapapers a month, but their are also more than half of a million  people who commute on the transit system a week.   This is a very important movement and the volunteers who volunteered to haggle comunters are demonstrating great environmental stewardship. 

 These are just a few ways to celebrate Earth Day from the EPA, but it is important to remember that we should be conscous of the environment every day and not just on Earth Day. 

Sources:

http://www.epa.gov/earthday/history.htm

http://www.epa.gov/earthday/

http://www.epa.gov/earthday/home.htm

http://www.epa.gov/earthday/classroom.htm

http://accuweather.ap.org/cgi-bin/apl.pl

Vanity Fair’s “Green Issue”

April 19, 2007 - 3 Responses

  A friend of mine  showed me the new issue of Vanity Fair for May 2007.  She thought that I would be interested because it is their second annual green issue.  This magazine is full of articles about the enviornment.  And guess who is on the cover?  The one and only Leonardo DiCaprio, if you have read my past blog about him, I am sure that you that he is quite the environmental activist.   If you are not a fan of Leo, there is still much more in this edition of Vanity Fair that may be worthwhile for you to read. 

      For example, their is an article entitled “Rush to Judgement”  by James Wolcott.  The subtitle or lead in for this article reads, “Attacking environmentalists as hippie- dup “wackos” who care more about spotted owls than people who use polar bears for propoganda, Rush Limbaugh has blinded millions of Americans to the climate crisis.”  This article proceeds to discuss of the refusal of many Americans to believe in global warming has been as a result partly of Limbaugh.  Wolcott said, ” Global warming’s most popular denialist, talk radio’s most intimidated showman, conservitism’s minister of disinformation, he has injected millions of semivacant American skulls with a cream filling of complaceny that has helped thrust this country into the forefront of backwards leadership.”  As you  may be able to tell from that excerpt, Wolcott is a firm believer in global warming and he is very upset by the number of Americans who are doubting it.  When we discussed global warming in class, we talked about how many people do not believe that it is a real issue, even though it is accepted in the scientific community.  If you are interested in reading this article visit www.vanityfair.com or purchase a copy of the magazine. 

                                      Click to download

(AP Photo/Craig McDean/Vanity Fair/PA)

      Other articles that you may be interested in reading are: An article writted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about his love for falcons and how the energy industry is threatening their exsistence, an interesting article about Prince Charels and how he is an environmental hero, and an article that relates to the ecological footprint lab that we did in class.   I found all of these articles to be very interesting and all of them somehow relate to class discussions whether it is about global warming, enviromental stewardship or ecological footprints.  I highly suggest buying a copy of the May 2007 edition of Vanity Fair or visiting www.vanityfair.com

Sources:

“An Ecosystem of One’s Own” by Alex Shounatoff.  Vanity Fair May 2007.

“A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Throne”  by Michael Shnayerson.  Vanity Fair May 2007.

“The Falcon’s Call” by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.  Vanity Fair May 2007.

“Rush to Judgement”  by James Wolcott. Vanity Fair May 2007. 

image:(AP Photo/Craig McDean/Vanity Fair/PA)

Watch out for toxic cleaners!!!

April 18, 2007 - One Response

When I was looking through the Chicago Tribune this morning, I read a headline that read, “Make a Green Sweep this spring…”  I decided to read the article and then thought I should blog about this.  Barbara Mahany, the author of the article, came across the results of a study from William Nazaroff, a professor of environmental engineering at the University of California at Berkeley.  Nazaroff conducted a four year $400,000 study which examined what he calls “the pollution sources right  under our nose”. 
In this study 17 cleaning products, commonly used in homes, and four air fresheners were examined.  The results showed that six of the cleaning products emitted ethyl-based glycols at a level that is three times higher than the amount that the US Protection Agency allows for outdoor pollutant standards.  The study also found that twelve of the cleaners studied contain a group of chemicals called terpenes.  Terpenes are found in many solvents, but they are most commonly found in solvents that have a citrus-based scent.  Terpenes are harmful because they rapidly react with the ozone which then produces formaldehyde and other small particle pollutants that are harmful for the lungs to inhale.  These harmful toxins reduce the indoor air qualities of homes.   This can be harmful for anyone who washes their own bathrooms with these cleaners. But, think about people who clean for their profession.  Nazaroff said that anyone who inahles those fumes while they are cleaning are inhaling them at three times the amount that are allowed to come out of a factory.  After I read that I was shocked.  Who knew that you could be exposed to three times the amount of hazardous fumes of factory by cleaning your bathroom!!!!

Click to download

(AP Photo/Amy Sancetta)

That was not however, the only harmful thing that Mahany reported. A 15 year study in Oregon that was presented at the National Center for the Health Statistics conference examined the death rates due to cancer of women who worked in the home and those who worked outside of the home. The results showed that there was a 54% higher chance of cancer for the women who stayed home. The study strongly suggested that household cleaning toxins were the reason why. The article did not mention how many women were studied or the specific type of cancer that the women suffered from, but since it was presented at the National Center For Health Statistics I am assuming that it is somewhat legitamate.
If you were at all disturbed by these results, like I was, you may be wondering what is the solution? Should we just stop cleaning in general, the answer is to look for other non-toxic cleaners or make your own solutions.  The website biggreenpurse.com, created by Diane MacEachern,  provides recipies for cleaners.  For example to clean a tub or sink, the website suggests using baking soda, liquid soap and water.  The directions read, “Sprinkle water on the tub or sink surface, followed by a generous shake of baking soda.  Scrub with a sponge or brislte brush.  Add a little of the liquid soap to the sponge for more cleaning power.  Rinse well.”  This is a fairly simple procedure, but if you prefer a quicker method or buying your solutions in a store, Mahany suggests buying your cleaning products at Whole Foods.  Will Betts the regional grocery coordinator for Whole Foods said, ” You don’t need to do the legwork to do your housecleaning.  Our standards are certainly stricter than the standards at all conventional markets. ”  What is the drawback.. they are a little more expensive than the average cleaner.  Mahany addressed the price issue by saying, “On one hand toxins lead to God knows what dangers;  on the other hand, a few bucks. ”  I think that this is a very valid point.  These cleaners are a few dollars cheaper, but they do not have the horrendous toxins that the other cleaners have. 

Sources:

Mahany, Barbara. “Make it a green sweep this spring. ”  Chicago Tribune. April 25, 2007

Copper Moon?

March 3, 2007 - 2 Responses

The moon will have an unusual copper tint on Saturday night.  Why, you may ask.  Well, it is because there will be a lunar eclipse.  A lunar eclipse is when the sun, the moon, and the Earth are all lined up, and the moon travels into the cone of the shadow that is casted by the Earth.  The moon does not become invisble when this happens, the moon appears as a dark copperish color because of the residiual light that is reflected to the Earth.   This will last for about 77 minutes (from about 22:40 to 23:57 GMT)  on Saturday night. 

PhotoAFP/File Photo:

Lunar eclipses usually occur every couple of years.  The last one happened on October 28, 2004.  But if you miss the one on Saturday another is expected to happen on August 28.   This eclipse is unique becasue it will be visible from every continent around the world.  According to NASA, the partial eclipse is sheduled to begin at 4:30 pm, while the total eclipse is expected to begin at 5:44 and last until 6:58 pm.  The total eclipse is expected to end at 8:11 Eastern Standard Time. 

sources: http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/OH/OH2007.html

AFP/File Photo:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070301/sc_afp/spaceastronomyeclipsemoon

Join the Fight to Help Stop, Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining!!

March 3, 2007 - One Response

 
Hollywood celebrities Woody Harrelson,  Daryl Hannah, and Leonardo DiCaprio are only three of 4732 people (as of 5:31 today) who have joined the fight to stop mountaintop removal coal mining.  What is mountaintop removal coal mining you might ask.  Well according to
http://www.ilovemountains.org/,  a website dedicated to stopping it, “Mountaintop removal is a radical form of coal mining in which entire mountains are literally blown up — and it is happening here in
America on a scale that is almost unimaginable.”   At this same website there is a video which describes the impacts of mountaintop coal removal.  It is a short but extremely informative film and I encourage everyone to watch it. 

 In this mode of removal, explosives are used to blow up mountains and then the debris from the mountains then carries over to land and often times fills nearby steams and rivers.  This causes contamination of water for many Americans.  So far over 450 mountains have been blown up in the
United States.  This has caused many harmful effects for people who live in the vicinity of the mountains.  After a mountain has been blown up the excess debris effects the amount and speed of the water in nearby streams which may cause flooding for nearby residents.  According to the movie, “Toxic coal slurry is held in hundreds of impoundments throughout
Appalachia.  In 2000, one of those impoundments broke and 300 million gallons of toxic sludge was sent into The Big Sandy River in
Kentucky.”  The EPA said that that incident was the worst environmental disaster east of the
Mississippi River. 

Click to download

This website is dedicated to the awareness of this problem and how it has negatively impacted the lives of many Americans.  If you are interested in learning more about this issue or watching the short film, I highly recommend it, visit the website www.ilovethemountains.org.  

Sources:  www.ilovethemountains.org

image: (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty) http://accuweather.ap.org/cgi-bin/apl.pl

Green Roofs… is it worth it?

March 2, 2007 - One Response

In class when were brainstorming ideas for our symposium project green house roofs were a possible topic. I decided to further research the idea and find out why they are beneficial.
I found and article that talked about how experiments were conducted. The National Research Council of Canada (NRC) and the University of Central Florida conducted two separate studies. The NRC designed a 800 square foot roof that was divided into two parts. One of the parts had a bare waterproofing membrane and the other part of the roof made out of the same waterproofing membrane was covered by a green roof made of six inches of lightweight soil and wildflowers. The University of Central Florida divided a roof into two sections also and but they covered half of their roof with plant vegetation native to Florida and six to eight inches of lightweight soil.
Theoretically green roofs are suppose to lower roof temperatures, better absorb rain water, and protect roof tops. The two experiments proved these theories to be correct. On one hot summer day in Ottawa the temperature was recorded to be 95 degrees F. The regular part of the roof reached 115 degrees f while the green roof only reached 77 degrees F. Similar results were found in Florida. The maximum average everyday temperature for the rooftop in Florida was 130 degrees F where the average temperature for the green roof section of the roof was only 91 degrees F which was about 22 degrees F lower.

           Click to download

This is a green roof that was planted on top of Tarkinton Elementary School in Chicago.

The green roofs also proved to lower the amount of energy demanded for the buildings of the roofs. The experiment in Canada proved to reduce the energy usage by 75%. The roofs also proved to delay the runoff time after a large storm.
Well, you may be asking if green roofs are this beneficial then why aren’t there more of them. The answer is quite simple….they are very expensive at first. According to Seattle’s King County Government, “The cost of green roofs is about $14 to $25/ft² ($150 to $270/m²), including waterproof membranes.” After about 40 years the cost of a green roof compared to a regular roof is only about 10% higher. And if you consider how much money you could save on heating and cooling then I’m sure that it would probably cost less. The long term benefits far exceed the financial burden of building a green roof.
I also discovered that there is a green roof conference. The Fifth Annual International Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, Conference, Awards & Trade Show is being help in Minneapolis, Minnesota on April 29, 30 and May 1. This conference according to its website has three main focuses for the conference. They are “1. Policies and Programs to Support Green Roofs
2. Green Roof Design and Implementation
3. Research and Technical Papers on Green Roof Performance.” This conference is dedicated to advancing the technology of green house building as well as rewarding people who have helped advance the cause. For more information about this conference visit the website http://greenroofs.org/minneapolis/

Sources: http://greenroofs.org/minneapolis/
http://www.wonderquest.com/green-roofs.htm
image; (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh) http://accuweather.ap.org/cgi-bin/apl.pl

Leonardo DiCaprio’s Movies about the Environment

March 2, 2007 - 4 Responses

     A friend of mine has a rather large obsession with Leonardo DiCaprio and talks about him basically all of the time.  I did not really know that much about him, other than the fact that he is an extremely good looking actor,  but my friend told me a ton about him and his environmental stances.   Leonardo is very dedicated to global warming and raising awareness of the problem.  I recently visited his website www.leaonardodicaprio.org and found out that he has an eco site.    At this site you can watch two short films that Leo made.  One movie is about global warming and the other is about water, you can view them by clicking on the link.  I highly recommend viewing these short films because they are very informative. 

                                                     

     In his movie about Global Warming, Leo explains why it is a problem, the effects of global warming, and offers some suggestions for how to become involved with the movement to reduce global warming.  Leo says that global warming has become such a problem because of our addiction to oil.  He stresses the importance of separating oil and state.  Leo mentioned about the increasing surface temperature and its effects for climate change.  Leo encourages people to drive hybrid cars, support clean-energy projects such as windmills, and vote for politicians who care about environmental issues.   

      Leo’s s movie about water is also very interesting.  We have started talking about water and how it is a limited resource in class latley. Leo’s film is dedicated to this issue.  He said that about 3% of all of the world’s water is fresh.  Water is a finite resource that is being threatened by pollution, war, overpopultion, misdistributing,  and climate change.   Pollution has increased the diseases found in water.  Human encroachment has caused the natural flow of water to change.  Leo said that, “Humans are poisoning, squandering,  and overburdening our water resources….which results inbillions of people not receiving an adequate water supply.”  Leo encourages people to conserves water and realize that ” Water = life and there is no separation…water is a basic human right.”  He encourages people to invest in smart water technologies and to conserve water rather than waste it.  He also encourages people to petition their local government representiatives to increase water regulations. 

The two films are relatively short but very informative, I encourage everyone to view them because they are beneficial. 

sources:

image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Leonardo_DiCaprio.jpeg

article and movies:   http://www.leonardodicaprio.org/

Drinking Water Quality…

February 3, 2007 - One Response

        Mr. McKinley’s Quetico question about the drinking water quality kind of got me interested in drinking water quality.  I never gone  to Quetico but based on Mr. Draski’s advise, I would probably drink the water there.   If water looks clean, I would drink it.  I cam across this article about the need to increase water purification, and it made me realize that just because water looks clean, it may not actually be clean. 

    According to this article, most tap wate and well water is not safe in the United States anymore due to pollution.  According to the article at www.freedrinkingwater.com/water-purification-need.htm:

We have reached to a point that, all sources of our drinking water, including municipal water systems, wells, lakes, rivers, and even glaciers, contain some level of contamination. Contaminants range from naturally-occurring minerals to man-made chemicals and by-products. While many contaminants are found at levels not enough not to cause immediate discomforts or sicknesses , it is proven that even low-level exposure to many common contaminants will, over time, cause severe illness including liver damage, cancer, and other serious ailments. Even the chemicals commonly used to treat municipal water supplies such as chlorine and fluoride are toxic and are known to have significant adverse effects on the human body.

 

Drinking water.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Drinking_water.jpg

After reading that I wondered how water could become so polluted.  Another article on the same site answered that question.   Water can be polluted by materials such as silt and dirt that enter the water as agricultural runoff.  There is also always the possibilty of shallow sources of water being infected by human and animal wastes.   But there are other ways that water can pollute water.  When water vapor is in the atmoshere, it acts similar to distilled water.  It does not really have any impurities when it stays aloft.  But when water vapor comes into contact with the earth, it combines with nitrogen, air-carbon dioxide, and oxgen.   The article provided the chemical reaction for that :

H20 + CO2    –>   H2C03

Water dissolves and collects Carbon Dioxide to produce Carbonic Acid

WHen this water reaches the earth, it has a slighlty acidic quality.  This water can pick up more additional carbon dioxide from decaying plant matter.  According to the article:

If, however, it has the opportunity to seep into the soil and pass through a limestone stratum, the acid condition due to the carbon dioxide will be neutralized. At the same time, the water will get a large amount of mineral con­tent. Chemically this can be diagrammed:

H2CO3 +  CaCO3   –>  Ca(HC03)2

Carbonic Acid reacts with Insoluble Calcium Carbonate to produce Soluble Calcium Bicarbonate The first article that I found also mentioned about the quality of bottled water versus the quality of tap water.  I always drink bottled water and do not really see a problem with it, I assume since it is bottled, it must be safe.  But apparently, that is not true.   The article says “In fact, about a quarter of all bottled water is actually bottled tap water, according to government and industry estimates (some estimates go as high as 40 percent).”  WHen I heard this, I was really surpirsed. There are two bills waiting approval in Sacramento, California now which would raise the standards of water bottle manufacurers.  Ellen Corbett, an  assemblywoman authored one of the bills, she said “People tout bottled water as this pure substance that’s trickling from clear mountain springs when, in fact, that may not be the case…When I pick up bottled water, I want to know it truly is something that’s good for me and better for me than drinking something.”

Bottled water is a huge industry, a 6 billion dollar industry.  Almost 70% of all Californians drink bottled watter.  It is expected to surpass milk, coffee, and beer and be the second most popular drinking beverage behind soft drinks.  Since bottled water is food product it is expected to pass the FDA’s approval where as tap water has to pass water quality standards.   Randy Kanouse, another California lobbyist said, “Of the hundreds of contaminants state and federal regulators measure, bottled water is subject to a higher standard for only two.” 

The new laws proposed in California would require that bottling plants are sujuect to annual inspections and that companies reoprt the level of contaminents of their product including lead, and other contaminents.  I thought that this was very interesting, and I guess that just because water comes in a bottle, it is not safer than water from the tap. 

Sources:
http://www.freedrinkingwater.com/water-bottled-unsafe-drinking.htm

http://www.freedrinkingwater.com/water-purification-need.htm

http://www.freedrinkingwater.com/water-education2/10-summary-water-quality-environment.htm

My water log

February 3, 2007 - One Response

Water is definatley something that I take for granted.   I know that I use alot of water but I don’t really have much of an idea how much water I actually use.  I decided that I was going to keep track of how much water I tend to use in a typical day and then calculate that to weeks.  This is what I found.  I use ATON of water!!!!

 For starters, I take two showers a day.  Some may say that thats wasteful but I take a shower in the morning to wake up and a shower after working out or practice each night.  To me that just makes sense, because I like to be clean.  But I found out that that uses a ton of water.   According to http://www.co.kane.il.us/kcstorm/waterfacts.asp, the average 10 minute shower uses 40 gallons of water.   Mutiply that times 2 and that means that I use 80 gallons of water on showering every day.  80 gallons (7 days a week) = 560 gallons  of water just on showering every week.   I aslo probably do one load of laundry every week and according to http://www.almanac.com/edpicks.0698/waterused.html it requires 30-60 gallons of water to do a large load of laundry.  That is kind of a wide range so I am going to go with the middle of the range and say that I use 45 gallons of water a week on laundry.   I also use alot of water when I brush my teeth every day.  I have a bad habit of leaving the water running while I brush my teeth which I am hopefully going to change as a result of my findings.  According  to http://www.co.kane.il.us/kcstorm/waterfacts.asp, I use 5 gallons of water every time that I leave the water running while I brush my teeth.  I brush my teeth four times a day so that means 5 (4) = 20 gallons (7 days  a week) = 140 gallons of water a week for brushing my teeth.   Also from the same site, every toilet flush uses 5 gallons of water.  5(4)= 20 gallons (7 days a week) = 140 gallons of water a week from flusing the  toilet. 

                     Dripping faucet 2.jpg

Okay so so far I use 560 gallons +45 gallons+ 140 gallons + 140 gallons = 885 gallons of water so far.  These are just some of the obvious sources of where I use water.  But water is also need in the production of many things.  For example, it is used in soda can production, newspaper production and gasoline production.  According to http://www.co.kane.il.us/kcstorm/waterfacts.asp:

                                             

Indirect uses of water also add up quickly:
Each gallon of gasoline  requires 1,000 gallons of water to produce.
Each can of soda requires 29,000 gallons of water to produce.
Each newspaper requires 66,000 gallons of water to produce.

I was very surprised and somewhat skeptical about these numbers when I read them, but I think that this is a valid site because it is sponsored by the Kane County Storm Management.  I drive  a Ford Explorer and it holds about 15 or so gallons of gas in its tank.   According to the above information, that means that filling up my tank uses 15(1000)= 15000 gallons of water.  I am personally not a big soda person but I probably drink at least one can of coke a week so that means that that 29000 gallons of water were used to produce that can.  I do not usually read the newspaper, I tend to get my news from the internet, so I did not think that newspaper usage really effected my water blog.  Okay so I definalely added more gallons of water to my weekly total now it is up to :

885 gallons+ 15000 gallons+ 29000 gallons= 44885 gallons of water per week. 

These are only just a few sources of where my water consumption comes from.  I am sure that I use much more water, but I am not aware of it.  Well great, now I know that I use a ton of water and surely way to much of it, but what can I do about it.  Luckily there are some simple steps that I can do to reduce my water consumption. For starters,  I can reduce the amount of time that I spend in the shower every day and  I can turn off the water while I brush my teeth.  According to http://www.co.kane.il.us/kcstorm/waterfacts.asp, these are some other ways to reduce water consumption:

By installing more efficient water fixtures and regularly checking for leaks, households can reduce daily per capita water use by about 30% to about 51.9 gallons per day.

Little leaks add up in a hurry. A faucet drip or invisible toilet leak that totals only two tablespoons a minute comes to 15 gallons a day. That’s 105 gallons a week and 5,460 wasted gallons of water a year.

Check every faucet in the house. A single dripping faucet can waste far more water in a single day than one person needs for drinking in an entire week. Don’t wait to fix a drip. Do it now!

Here’s a two-for-one idea if you have a fish tank in the house. When you clean the tank, use the dirty water on your houseplants. It’s rich, in nitrogen and phosphorous, which gives you a nice fertilizer while you use the same water twice.

Select the appropriate water level for the size of your load of laundry. Most washers now offer preset water levels for small, medium, and large loads. Use full loads whenever possible.

Have you ever heard of showering “The Navy Way”? Because fresh water is relatively scarce on ships, sailors were taught to just get wet, and then turn off the shower while soaping and scrubbing, and turn it on again briefly to rinse off. It’s a great water conservation technique.

These are just a few of many tips that the website provides. If you are intersted in learning more I highly suggest that you visit it. This log has certainly made me more aware of the amount of water I use although I am sure there are many more sources of water consumption that I did not mention, and I will consciously make an effort to reduce the amount of water that I consume. 

image credit:http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Dripping_faucet_2.jpg

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.